Nazis View of Marriage :: Marriage Germany History Essays

Nazis View of Marriage The discipline Socialist Party quickly turned heads in July 14th, 1933 through the Law Concerning the Formation of New Parties, by declaring itself the only political party that was allowed to exist in the Third Reich (156.HCCR). Soon thereafter, the political perception the Nazis were seeming to enforce would transform the whole view of German culture, economy, race, and especially, the way German individuals emotionally and physically interacted with one another. One relationship in the German recount that stood out in my mind was the Nazis view of marriage, its purpose, its use and its representation in the German state. The Nazis perceived marriage as a processing factory, where each partner had certain roles and purposes to fulfill. Through the creation of speeches, art and laws, the relationship that would stand to the occasion in representing the Third Reich was the relation betwixt man and woman...marriage. Thesis Statement Marriage defined the Volksgemeinschaft, or community of people, of Germany because it was the basis relationship that connected the small world of the household to the larger German community. Also, marriage made it rightfully possible to produce pure blood German children with the genetically correct German parents. Marriage was so vital to the Nazis because it was the true(a) basis of their socio-political perspectives. In effect, see if you agree with my thesis students...In order to define Volksgemeinschaft, the Nazis constructed marriage by associating the relationship with modeled public male and private pistillate roles, and with the assumption of procreating pure blood Aryan children. The Nazis used marriage to define their Volksgemeinschaft because it enforced the vertical relationship in marriage into the Nazi based society and it would help increase the capacity and population of the Aryan race.How the Nazis constructed marriage Part one Nazis constructed marriag e to define their community of people by associating the relationship with modeled public male and private female roles. In the Nazis perspective, marriage was no longer a physical or emotional charity between a man and a woman, yet it became a small system within a larger system that would sustain both the German households and the German society. Marriage soon became defined as a modeled system when Hitler depicted the Nazis preferences in a speech to the National Socialist Womens section on September 8th, 1934.

A Speech Given By Frederick Do -- essays research papers

FREDERICK DOUGLASS&8217S POWERS OF APPEALAfter his escape from thralldom, Frederick Douglass chose to promote the abolition of slavery by speaking about the actions and effects that result from that institution. In an excerpt from a July 5, 1852 speech at Rochester, New York, Douglass asks the oppugn What to the slave is the Fourth of July? This question is a bold one, and it demands attention. The effectiveness of his oration is derived from the personal appeals in which he engages the listener. At once in this speech, Douglass appeals to his listeners&8217 religious tendencies. He asks his audience, &8220am I, therefore, called upon to bring our small-scale offering to the national altar&8230 (441). Religious appeal is so important because the majority of his audience is Christian, and he implies that Christianity, in its ostensible purity, allows the mishandling of human life to the compass point of slavery. By relating Christianity directly to slavery, his listeners must que stion the validity of their Christian doctrines in relation to the institution of slavery. In doing so, they must eliminate their acceptance of one of these traditions the betting odds are that Christianity holds a much more loyal following than slavery, in which case slavery will be given up as a practice. Douglass also quotes from Psalms 1371-6, and the ludicrous concept that slaveholders expect their slaves to be joyous in their state of bondage is the essential meaning of the passage he chooses as it relates to the comparable situation of the Babylonians&8217 captives (442). His persuasive appeal in this case is the notion that any pious Christian would have sympathy for the lamenting captives and contempt for the captors in the Psalms passage. If this assumption is correct, then the same pious Christians surely should realize the situation of the slaves on this day and every other. Additionally, in asking this question, he asserts at one time that the meaning of the Fourth of July is entirely different from that of the salvage, white American. Douglass concedes that the whites of America had reason to rejoice &8220the rich inheritance of stillice, liberty, prosperity, and independence (441). However, he also illustrates that there are just as many reasons for slaves to scorn the traditional meaning of the Fourth of July. Furthermore, these reasons are as ... ...w, with all of the activity and thinking life requires, the slave&8217s man can be questioned (443). For the white man listening to this argument, it is required that he empathizes with the situation of the slave, because in actuality there is much in common between the free and the enslaved. This is precisely Douglass&8217s point bondage is the only hindrance of slaves&8217 abilities to lead a fulfilling life. Douglass&8217s appeals to his audience are specifically directed toward white, Christian males. He is fully aware at all times he must show that he can relate with them. As Christians, how should they have felt had they been denied their remediate to practice religion and believe in their god? What would they do if the country they so loved chained them to a life of servitude? Finally, what would all the work to concord a family and desire for self-improvement have accomplished if it only benefited a master, but not a wife and children? Douglass deliberately addresses those aspects of life that mean the close to to his audience because in doing so he is sure to gain the listeners&8217 full attention and consideration of the immorality of slavery.